Postoperative recovery assessment after appendectomy in children - laparoscopic versus open technique

نویسندگان

چکیده

Introduction/Objective. Surgery is a ?gold standard? in treating the acute appendicitis pediatric patients. The aim of study was to determine effect open and laparoscopic appendectomy on postoperative recovery, return everyday activities, quality life patients operated for appendicitis. Methods. This prospective performed at Institute Children Youth Healthcare Vojvodina, over period 10 months. approved by Ethics Committee Institute. All treated surgery were divided into two basic groups ? or three subgroups, depending degree We analyzed length surgery, oral intake, establishing peristalsis, hospital stay, after surgery. Results. Laparoscopic technique 60 (48%), method 65 (52%). In 66.7% laparoscopically patients, peristalsis occurred earlier (p < 0.001), stay shorter (5.95 1.21 days) (Z = -3.054; p 0.002), total score daily activities showed statistically significantly better -7.667; 0.000), they achieved high level (t 2.773; 0.007). Conclusion. advantages minimally invasive treatment children are reflected faster re-establishment functioning, good life.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: the Risk of Postoperative Infectious Complications

BACKGROUND Despite the reported advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), ongoing debate exists about a possible increase in postoperative infectious complication rates especially intraabdominal infections and wound infection, unless wound protection is utilized. METHODS All consecutive appendectomies (open and laparoscopic) performed over 4 months were included in this prospective study....

متن کامل

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE This study aims to use meta-analysis to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a pediatric population. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Meta-analysis is a statistical tool that can be used to evaluate the literature in both qualitative and quantitative ways, accounting for variations in characteristics that can influence overall estimate of outcomes of interest. Meta-analysis of lapar...

متن کامل

Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy In Children: A Comparison Of Outcomes

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic treatment of pediatric appendicitis remains controversial especially in cases of complications including perforated and gangrenous appendicitis and their attendant overall postoperative outcomes. This study evaluates the comparison of various outcomes in open (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHODS: A retrospective chart reviewed was performed on 382 co...

متن کامل

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis in Children.

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children. METHODS This study was conducted as a retrospective comparison of hospital records for postoperative complications, duration of operation, and postoperative length of stay between children (aged <18y) who underwent laparoscopic (n=190) or open (n=199) appendectom...

متن کامل

Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Comparison of Complications

Although between 4% and 20% of all appendectomies in adults are performed laparoscopically, this procedure is rarely done in the pediatric age group because of the substantially more difficult technique, the expected risks and suspected higher rate of complications. In a prospective study of 500 consecutive appendectomies, we tried to assess the actual rate of complications of each operative ap...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['0370-8179', '2406-0895']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/sarh210710015a